Anterior Compartment Le

But are we really come to this?

Io non so se le ultime rivelazioni in merito alla casa di Montecarlo, le strane lettere pubblicate su alcuni altrettanto strani siti esterni e riprese prontamente dai berluscones, le voci che affermano che la società off-shore a cui An vendette l’appartamento e che ora l’affitta a Tulliani sia di Tulliani stesso siano vere o false. So, però, che a tutto c’è un limite. Sappiamo tutti che se Fini fosse rimasto well attached to Berlusconi, these investigations by Il Giornale Libero and would never have started, but they have the right to do so. They can talk all they want of homes in Monaco and Scavolini, to sign petitions and demand the resignation of Fini. They have the right, as he has the right not to give her. Available today but really hit rock bottom: the daily run by Maurizio Belpietro the headline: "The president has no clothes." In name and fact. On the front page, in fact, has been whipped a picture of Fini nude, covered only by a fig leaf. But the funniest part is the subtitle: "The document states that we found the house in Monaco is the brother in law. Fini said the victim of a conspiracy. To show that haunt him, not publishing his photos without veils. " Aaah, you got that benefactors? Since you do not get him, make him the courtesy to add a fig leaf for those shots.

-

editorial, Belpietro back to the question and said: "Days ago there was a paparazzo who live with me this summer caught him in embarrassing attitude . Nothing serious, of course, only a series of snapshots without pants, that would be boon to some gossip weekly, always looking for images itching of famous people. The photojournalist, given the survey to be released, he thought we were concerned and turned to me. I confess that at first I cheated my hands and I was tempted to publish the service: the dozens of shots into the sea after a descent into the abyss with the wetsuit, they have their unintentional comedy I wanted to share with readers. Then I imagined the comments Fini, who would speak of vulgarity, claiming persecution by the press. " In other words, has obscured the photos only to avoid accusations by Fini and for fear of being accused of "vulgarity". Evidently, Belpietro believes doing so, to pass through a gentleman, as if the publication with the addition of a fig leaf was not as vulgar. Director continues: "So, I prefer to give him the portraits in full, avoiding the embarrassment to the President of the Chamber of being published without veils. I will just play a single instant, due for censored show those I read that I did not invent anything. "And by golly, Fini should thank its free for the embarrassment that has avoided! But apart from the meanness and the absurdity of this editorial, we're sure that behind this initiative, there is no attempt at a sort of "blackmail"? It 's a bit like saying' we have your foto compromettenti e potremmo pubblicare se non te ne stai buono’. Per carità, è solo un’ipotesi, ma sarà poi così remota?